Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:07
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Can whey protein cause allergies in people sensitive to milk?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Will friendly dogs protect their owners?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
I dreamt my mother had died and I cried so much in my dream. What does it mean?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
CNN’s Live ‘Good Night, and Good Luck’ Telecast Spurs Special Coverage - Variety
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Student Solves a Long-Standing Problem About the Limits of Addition - WIRED
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
NBA mock draft 2025: Updated projection with NBA Finals now over - SBNation.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
One Of The Rarest Video Games Ever Has Been Preserved Online - GameSpot
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.